Friday, 28 July 2017
logo
Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace
issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders.
        



dv-header-dday
     |      View our Twitter page at twitter.com/defenceredbox     |     

defencenews

Ian Kearns and Ken Gude published 'The new front line: Security in a changing world' as a working paper for the ippr Commission on National Security on 13 February 2008.

The full text of the working paper can be accessed at:

http://www.ippr.org/publicationsandreports/publication.asp?id=588

In their paper, Kearns and Gude argue for a wider conceptualisation of what constitutes 'national security', and identify five 'forces of change' in the contemporary security environment:

GlobalisationPoverty and failing/failed statesClimate changePolitical Islam (Islamism)'Socio-economic vulnerability' (the susceptibility of critical national infrastructure to attack)

They therefore reach three key conclusions:

That on security issues, governments cannot act alone, particularly on issues such as critical national infrastructure.That 'security must be common to all or is unlikely to be delivered for any'That 'the core challenge of security policy is to enhance and extend our mechanisms of government'

The paper concludes with a list of questions that need considering if the challenges that this broadened definition of 'national security' raises are to be address effectively.

Media reaction

Richard Norton-Taylor, 'Thinktank warns of new threats to Britain's national security', Guardian (13 February 2008).

Private Eye (22 February 2008) argued that the paper was 'packed with scary ideas'. 'In places the paper read like a Jack Bauer fantasy,' they reported. They noted, however:

The IPPR's "Security Commission" is one of its most high-powered gatherings, with Paddy Ashdown, George Robertson, Charles Guthrie and many other big names on board. It is also one of the IPPR's better-funded programmes, receiving money from Raytheon, De La Rue, Booz Allen Hamilton and EDS.

Some of these companies already make millions from the homeland security boom in the US, so perhaps its no surprise the IPPR seem intent on scaring everyone to death here too.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.