Thursday, 16 August 2018
Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace
issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders.

     |      View our Twitter page at     |     


Marking the passing of some of those who have served this country with distinction. We welcome recollections from family and comrades

ASH William Ash MBE 30 November 1917 - 26 April 2014

Surrendered US citizenship to join Royal Canadian Air Force. Flew Spitfires with 411 Sqn, shot down 1942. Model for Hilts the Cooler King in Great Escape? Escaped from 1945 march

BITTON (later Col) Miloslav Bitton (born Kratochvil) 14 October 1919 - 25 February 2014

Helped Czech airforce and army escapees. Escaped to join Czechoslovak Infantry Batn Israel. Siege of Tobruk. Volunteered for RAF. 310 Sqn 1945 Spitfire escort for Ruhr raids

CLARKE Capt Thomas Ellis Clarke AAC died 26th April 2014 aged 30 in Afghanistan. See full eulogy published 27th April 2014 on Defence Viewpoints

GORMAN Lt (?) Sir John Gorman CVO, CBE, MC, Croix de Guerre 1 February 1923 - 26 May 2014

Ordered his Sherman tank to ram a King Tiger in Normandy when gun jammed

KEMBALL Brigadier Humphrey Gurdon Kemball CBE MC died 6 May 2014 aged 94

LYNCH Lt Col Ivan Lynch died 1st March 2014 aged 86

MILLAR Lt Gurth Hoyer Millar 13 DEcember 1929 - 6 March 2014

Malay Scouts (SAS) and Artists Rifles (National Service)

MORRIS Lt Col (James William George) Bill Morris RA died 20 May 2014 aged 83

ROE Sergeant (Herbert) Maurice Roe MM and MiD 4 June 1917 - 6 May 2014

Territorial who trained for No 2 Commando, raid on Burhou 7/8 Sept 1942, invited to join SOE as wireless operator in occupied France (Jedburghs) then Force 136 Hyena in Burma

SHEPPARD Wg Cdr Raymond Francis Sheppard RNZAR and RAF died 25the April 2014 aged 91

SMITH Col Stanley Jackman Smith died 30th April 2014 aged 92

VARVILL Lt Col Simon Varvill died 19 April 2014 aged 67

Memorial Day, The Eternal Observance, by Paul Floyd and Ben Sheen of Stratfor

The act of formal remembrance is one of the most profound human gestures, whetherit is conducted on the personal or the national level. Originally a commemorationof the Union and Confederate dead from the American Civil War, Memorial Day in theUnited States codifies the act of remembrance, paying tribute to those who died inmilitary service. Memorial Day is specific to America, but honoring the memory ofthose who sacrificed their lives for their country, ideals or comrades-in-arms isuniversal.

Throughout history, the more expansive a civilization, the deeper the pool of
resources from which it can draw and the taller its ambition. The collective
offers myriad benefits, from breeding stock to greater capacity for production, to
increased manpower for agriculture, construction or defense. However, the size of
the collective is proportional to the amount of resources it needs to survive. The
imperative to use all means necessary, including force, to ensure the longevity of
a country, state or civilization, is ever present. Unfortunately, the calculus of
conflict has not changed a great deal over the millennia: The interests of the
collective endure above all else. The recent events in Ukraine are a good example
of how rapidly things can destabilize along these lines.

Human cost is the true price of warfare. It certainly makes sense to postulate

that if we cannot do away with war, which seems unlikely, then at least nations
can reduce the human toll. Technology, innovation and modernization have gone a
long way toward driving down the number of deaths modern armies incur, but this
often does not help the civilian population caught in the middle. There is no
dispute that civilians should be kept separate from war. So much of modern
targeting and rules of engagement is designed to minimize collateral damage, with
varying degrees of success. But conflict has an uncanny way of turning up at
civilian doorsteps, no matter how advanced the technology. It has many forms, too,
from unintended ordnance to suicide devices, starvation, disease, firebombs,
commandeered aircraft, or even an officer and a military chaplain in dress

In vain, pundits and theorists have repeatedly observed that new advances in
technology would either end war in some fashion or eliminate the need for manpower
on the battlefield and thus nullify the human cost. Time and again this has proved

I Am Become Death

Manhattan Project scientist Robert Oppenheimer was a victim of inventor's remorse,
which started to manifest around July 16, 1945, on the day of the Trinity nuclear
test. Despite his reflections on becoming death, Oppenheimer's legacy has yet to
destroy a world. And rather than make war untenable, nuclear devices have simply
become weapons of last resort that have balanced and deterred, but not prevented,

Post-World War II conflicts have steadily become more limited in scope. This
limitation manifests in terms of geographic boundaries, numbers of actors
involved, objectives and the resources committed. The deterrent function of the
Cold War helped prevent these conflicts from getting out of hand, the looming
specter of nuclear annihilation proving to be a useful disincentive. Since the end
of the Cold War, the United States has been the sole superpower, whose
overwhelming military capability has discouraged large-scale conflict.

Due to these dynamics, U.S. casualties in war have steadily declined and the
memory of global conflict is also rapidly approaching its living margin.
Increasingly few witnesses to a world war remain. But the stomach for dead young
men and women outside of an unavoidable existential conflict is ever contracting.
The proliferation of mass media also means that war can be piped directly to our
mobile devices, and the immediacy of this media has brought the consumer closer to
conflict, whereas time lag between an event and its reporting used to create a
natural buffer. What once took days or weeks in film production and transport now
can be done in nearly real time. Memes, tweets, social media campaigns and
pictures streaming straight from a conflict far more easily shape public opinion.

But counting your dead as a measure of conflict is illusory. Advancing medical
techniques mean that it is now possible to survive horrific wounds that would have
been fatal even a year ago. Close to a million coalition participants in the
Afghan and Iraq campaigns have received "non-fatal" wounds, many of them
classified as "life changing." Losing an eye is life changing but manageable.
Losing all four limbs, or use thereof, is beyond the imagination of most. The cost
is still very real.

This continued human price tag associated with war has driven a strong movement to
remove combatants from the combat zone, or at least have them orchestrate from a
distance. But there are problems with that premise too, as well as the emergence
of unmanned systems as a military panacea.

Part Man, Part Machine

The logical way to remove the human cost from conflict would seem to be automated
combat systems, independent of human control. Beyond even the ethical
considerations, or the difficulties of factoring Asimov's laws of robotics into
kill-capable autonomous systems, it is generally accepted that self-governing war
robots would be fairly poor at hearts and minds operations. Counterinsurgency, if
needed, would still require a human touch, not a cold robotic one. And then there
is the fact that even remote armies still have human masters, and they become
seductive targets. In a time when we value each individual life to the point that
we spend the resources to send robots to war in their place, we inadvertently make
each life that much more worth the taking. It is also impossible to fully secure a
domestic population. In the era of global terrorism (a tactic used in response to
overwhelming conventional power), civilians remain the softest targets. Determined
enemies will always attack where they can impose the most cost.

Fundamentally, when mere diplomacy is exhausted, it is left to the final executor
of political will -- the soldier, sailor, airman or marine -- to take issue with a
nation's enemies, or to look to expand or protect the interests of the state.
Those interests are inherently rooted in resources that are finite, which create
imperatives in a zero sum environment and inevitably lead states to use force in
order to meet them. In this light, conflict is unavoidable, and that conflict will
have a human cost.

Ultimately, Memorial Day is about remembering this human cost of war and honoring
the memories of those who fought and died. No matter how much we would like to, it
is impossible to completely divorce people from warfare. No matter how good
technology gets, or how far nations distance themselves from their war fighting,
there will always be fresh names to eulogize on Memorial Day.

Editor's note: Reflecting the collaborative nature of Stratfor, our analyses as a rule do not carry bylines. This Memorial Day analysis is an exception. The lead authors are Military Analyst Paul Floyd and Managing Editor of Actionable Intelligence Ben Sheen. Floyd is a former Army Ranger Staff Sergeant. Sheen is a former British Army officer. Both served in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Add comment

Security code

Latest from

  • KP- ISIS claims responsibility for the deadly attack in Kabul city
    The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Khurasan (ISIS-K) has claimed responsibility behind the deadly attack in capital Kabul targeting an education center. The group’s Amaq news agency claimed the responsibility by issuing short statement on Thursday. Without disclosing further proofs, the group claimed that a suicide bomber belonging to the group carried out an attack in Shi’ite area o Kabul city.
  • 1tvnews- Siege near spy training center in Kabul ends
    Afghan forces killed two gunmen who entered an unfinished building to launch attack on nearby intelligence service training center in Kabul on Thursday. The gunmen got into the building in Qalai Wazir in Police District 5, west Kabul, around 10:00a.m. Sporadic gunfires, and a couple of explosions were heard from site of the attack and after six hours, authorities declared that the siege ended.
  • KP- Taliban militants suffer heavy casualties in US airstrikes in Helmand
    The Taliban militants have suffered heavy casualties during the airstrikes conducted by the US forces in southern Helmand province of Afghanistan. The provincial government media office in a statement said the US forces carried out airstrikes targeting Taliban militants in Nad Ali district. The statement further added that the airstrike was carried out in the vicinity of Chah Anjir area of the district, leaving at least 13 militants dead.
  • KP- Fresh clashes erupt among Taliban and ISIS in Nangarhar province
    Fresh clashes have erupted among the Taliban militants and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Khurasan (ISIS-K) militants in eastern Nangarhar province of Afghanistan. The 201st Silab Corps of the Afghan Military in the East said the latest clashes have erupted between the two sides in Deh Bala district. The source further added that the latest clashes have left one ISIS militant dead so far.
  • KP- Bodies of Pakistanis killed in Ghazni city being shifted to Pakistan
    Khattak was citing reports regarding the killing and apprehension of several Pakistani militants during the Ghazni clashes as he asked the Pakistani authorities in for an explanation. Calling the involvement of the Pakistani militants the repetition of the Jalalabad fiasco in 1989, Khattak said authorities in Pakistan must change its policy.
  • rferl- Afghanistan, The 'Unintended Casualty' Of U.S. Sanctions On Iran
    As the United States reinstates crippling economic sanctions on Iran, Washington's ally in the region, Afghanistan, could become collateral damage. A first wave of U.S. sanctions against Iran that had been eased under a 2015 nuclear deal went back into effect on August 7, targeting the country's economy. But Washington's censures of Tehran will also hurt Afghanistan, which has forged increasingly strong economic links with its western neighbor.
  • Reuters- Afghan Taliban considering Eid holiday ceasefire
    The Taliban are considering announcing a ceasefire during next week’s Eid holiday, despite heavy fighting seen over recent days in the central Afghan city of Ghazni, two senior Taliban officials said. They said no decision had been taken but senior leaders would meet either on Tuesday evening or Wednesday to discuss the option, which was being pushed by some Muslim states and other parties with good relations to the movement.
  • KP- Afghan forces foil bomb explosions in two different parts of Kabul
    The Afghan security forces have foiled two explosions in two different parts of capital Kabul as the anti-government armed militants are attempting to increase attacks in key provinces and cities of the country. The Criminal Investigation Department said Tuesday that an improvised explosive device was discovered from Deh Mazang area of the city close to Park Shahr.
  • Stripes- Battle for Ghazni ebbs as Taliban capture base in northern Afghanistan
    The U.S. military appears to have ended its bombing campaign in the embattled city of Ghazni, which was the scene of heavy fighting after the Taliban tried to storm it on Friday. An Afghan-led clearing operation to drive the last remaining insurgents from the city, located about 100 miles southwest of Kabul, was underway on Tuesday evening, but no U.S. air support had been needed for the first time since fighting started on Friday, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan said in a statement.
  • Reuters- Afghan forces say regaining control of much of besieged city
    After five days of fighting, Ghazni, a strategically vital center two hours from Kabul on the main highway between the capital and southern Afghanistan was a city of burned-out buildings and vehicles with bodies lying in the streets. Local officials had been warning for months that the Taliban’s growing control over surrounding districts had left Ghazni vulnerable to attack and President Ashraf Ghani faced bitter accusations over the failure to protect the city.

British military casualties - Editorial policy

In the service of our country.

Eulogies for all personnel killed on UK operations in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere are posted as soon as they have been released by the UK Ministry of Defence. Each eulogy we publish for men down in operations brings a lump to the throat. We are losing the best of the best. Politicians must ensure that, when the newspaper cuttings have faded, their sacrifice has had some meaning, has helped bring about a good result. Anything else would be a waste for which they will be eternally condemned.

There is invariably at least a 24 hour gap between the official release of news of an event and the naming of the dead. This is to allow families to be informed and proper eulogoies to be produced. Occasionally families request no euologies or comment. We abide by guidance we receive on such sensitive matters. We regret that information on those who sacrifice almost as much through grave injury is seldom released by the MoD for operational reasons, and so we are unable to pay tribute.


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.