Monday, 01 May 2017
logo
Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace
issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders.
        



dv-header-dday
     |      View our Twitter page at twitter.com/defenceredbox     |     

militaryoperations

Written by Simon Roberts

Soldiers at Camp Phoenix, located near Kabul, are facing hard times. With the shelves at the base store looking a little bare; there's no Irish Spring Body Wash, no Doritos and no Aspirin. While actual items themselves may seem a little trivial, the missing supplies underscore a more serious problem, which senior military officials have been saying for months: U.S. and coalition troops must find new routes to supply what will be a rapidly growing force in Afghanistan, ones that avoid the treacherous border areas of Pakistan where convoys have been ambushed.


Supplying an army in any war is crucial; it's not just bullets and bombs, but everything from fuel to lettuce that must be shipped in by the ton and the truckload. And in a country like Afghanistan which is landlocked, mountainous and with few good roads supplying an army poses enormously difficult challenges even without attacks by militants.

Recent announcements made last month that the military had reached transit deals with Russia and several Central Asian states to the north of Afghanistan, to provide an alternate route from Pakistan should help the situation, but it's not yet clear whether any new route would be able to absorb the heavy traffic.

However a route through Russia and neighbouring countries is not necessarily a long-term solution either. The over-land route is much longer and more expensive, and dealing with repressive regimes in Central Asia also could pose political dilemmas.

Sensitive military goods, such as weapons and ammunition, are transported by military convoy or air, and have not been hurt by supply-route problems, but air transport for non-combat goods is prohibitively expensive and also logistically difficult.

Currently subcontractors transport about 75 percent of non-sensitive military goods for U.S. troops from the port in Karachi, through the Torkham border crossing into Afghanistan. About 125 shipping containers pass through that crossing daily. It's the shortest route to Kabul and Bagram Air Base yet it goes through narrow roads, mountain passes and hostile areas. Despite the risk, security is often lax and in recent months, Taliban-led militants have frequently attacked the military shipping containers. Militants have destroyed more than 300 shipping containers so far, torching at least 80 Humvees for the Afghan National Army.

Due to the escalating number of attacks, Pakistan has suspended traffic through the crossing three times in the past several weeks alone in order to launch offensives against the militants. At the other major crossing in Pakistan, through Chaman in Baluchistan province, tribesmen blockaded the road for five days recently because a tribesman was killed, resulting in the stranding of hundreds of trucks and fuel tankers.

However, Taliban-led militants are not the only ones to blame though. Some drivers are known to steal fuel and supplies from the trucks, or fake militant attacks and sell the goods on themselves.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.