Wednesday, 29 March 2017
Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace
issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders.

     |      View our Twitter page at     |     


Author's Note from The Next Decade, by George Friedman

The U.S. is now an Empire.

This book is about the relation between empire, republic, and the exercise of power
in the next ten years. It is a more personal book than The Next 100 Years because I
am addressing my greatest concern, which is that the power of the United States in
the world will undermine the republic. I am not someone who shuns power. I
understand that without power there can be no republic. But the question I raise is
how the United States should behave in the world while exercising its power, and
preserve the republic at the same time.

I invite readers to consider two themes. The first is the concept of the unintended
empire. I argue that the United States has become an empire not because it intended
to, but because history has worked out that way. The issue of whether the United
States should be an empire is meaningless. It is an empire.

The second theme, therefore, is about managing the empire, and for me the most
important question behind that is whether the republic can survive. The United
States was founded against British imperialism. It is ironic, and in many ways
appalling, that what the founders gave us now faces this dilemma. There might have
been exits from this fate, but these exits were not likely. Nations become what they
are through the constraints of history, and history has very little sentimentality
when it comes to ideology or preferences. We are what we are.

It is not clear to me whether the republic can withstand the pressure of the empire,
or whether America can survive a mismanaged empire. Put differently, can the
management of an empire be made compatible with the requirements of a republic? This
is genuinely unclear to me. I know the United States will be a powerful force in the
world during this next decade--and for this next century, for that matter--but I
don't know what sort of regime it will have.

I passionately favor a republic. Justice may not be what history cares about, but it
is what I care about. I have spent a great deal of time thinking about the
relationship between empire and republic, and the only conclusion I have reached is
that if the republic is to survive, the single institution that can save it is the
presidency. That is an odd thing to say, given that the presidency is in many ways
the most imperial of our institutions (it is the single institution embodied by a
single person). Yet at the same time it is the most democratic, as the presidency is
the only office for which the people, as a whole, select a single, powerful leader.

In order to understand this office I look at three presidents who defined American
greatness. The first is Abraham Lincoln, who saved the republic. The second is
Franklin Roosevelt, who gave the United States the world's oceans. The third is
Ronald Reagan, who undermined the Soviet Union and set the stage for empire. Each of
them was a profoundly moral man... who was prepared to lie, violate the law, and
betray principle in order to achieve those ends. They embodied the paradox of what I
call the Machiavellian presidency, an institution that, at its best, reconciles
duplicity and righteousness in order to redeem the promise of America. I do not
think being just is a simple thing, nor that power is simply the embodiment of good
intention. The theme of this book, applied to the regions of the world, is that
justice comes from power, and power is only possible from a degree of ruthlessness
most of us can't abide. The tragedy of political life is the conflict between the
limit of good intentions and the necessity of power. At times this produces
goodness. It did in the case of Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Reagan, but there is no
assurance of this in the future. It requires greatness.

Geopolitics describes what happens to nations, but it says little about the kinds of
regimes nations will have. I am convinced that unless we understand the nature of
power, and master the art of ruling, we may not be able to choose the direction of
our regime. Therefore, there is nothing contradictory in saying that the United
States will dominate the next century yet may still lose the soul of its republic. I
hope not, as I have children and now grandchildren--and I am not convinced that
empire is worth the price of the republic. I am also certain that history does not
care what I, or others, think.

This book, therefore, will look at the issues, opportunities, and inherent
challenges of the next ten years. Surprise alliances will be formed, unexpected
tensions will develop, and economic tides will rise and fall. Not surprisingly, how
the United States (particularly the American president) approaches these events will
guide the health, or deterioration, of the republic. An interesting decade lies

Published by Stratfor. Click here to buy

Add comment

Security code

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.