Thursday, 27 July 2017
logo
Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace
issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders.
        



dv-header-dday
     |      View our Twitter page at twitter.com/defenceredbox     |     

reviews

The UK's Whole Force Concept - which aims to reconfigure reserves and private-sector defence personnel more closely alongside military personnel - is not fit-for-purpose and lacks overall enterprise-level planning, argues a new RUSI Briefing Paper.

'Making the Whole Force Concept a Reality' by John Louth and Peter Quentin examines the progress and suitability of the Whole Force Concept to the transformation of British Defence.

The Whole Force Concept is a UK defence policy that aims to encompass all personnel required to deliver Defence outputs, including: non-operational roles, covering Regular and Reserve Service personnel, Civil Servants and other civilians, including contractors.

The paper suggests that this new policy 'has been driven by the search for financial efficiencies and the recognition that many essential defence skills now reside in the private sector rather than the armed forces.' The problems with the implementation of the Whole Force Concept go much beyond the widely noted failure to date to recruit an increased number of reservists.

Even though this change is meant to usher in very profound change to notions of the military instrument, the report argues that the 'Whole Force Concept has not been effectively managed and is often neglected and misunderstood'.

'This complex and multi-part enterprise requires some focussed enterprise-level planning and management. This seems to be missing from within government, leaving the notion of the Whole Force Concept to free-wheel. This is unacceptable if UK defence now rests on the successful implementation of this idea.'

'The case has hardly been made to the public, and how it is to be operationalised remains unclear. It is as if a new and exciting belief system has emerged without the enabling architecture of churches, priests and congregations; a great idea, but somehow lacking in physicality.'

The paper highlights the opportunities for partnering between the military and the private sector (and between companies offering goods and service to defence) presented in the Whole Force Concept. But not enough has been done to best rationalise the best mix of public sector and private sector personnel and services at a strategic level:

'It is important to develop the thinking around the Whole Force so that defence capabilities reside where they are best managed and developed across an ever-expanding defence public-private partnership - actively shaped and deliberately managed as a whole enterprise.'

The Paper calls for 'more overt thinking needs to be undertaken on the articulation of requirements, the provision of surge capabilities and the generation of replacements, both in theatre and right through the defence value-chain. Decision-making has to be open and subject to full Parliamentary scrutiny. So the challenge for Westminster, Whitehall and corporate boardrooms is to operationalise
an idea that already forms part of the taxonomy of defence. The myriad security challenges the UK faces suggests it cannot shirk this responsibility.'

Access entire paper at: www.rusi.org/wholeforceconcept2014

Professor John Louth, is Director of Defence, Industries and Society at RUSI and Peter Quentin is Research Fellow in Land Warfare Studies at RUSI.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.