Articles and analysis

AI logoMIND THE GAP VIII — STRATEGIC BALANCE IN THE NORTHERN THEATRE: THE WINDOW, THE RISKS, THE RECKONING

By Robin Ashby, Director General UK Defence Forum; Rapporteur, High North Observatory

The Window

There is, at present, a window. It is not a matter of optimism. It is a matter of arithmetic.

Russia retains what matters most for strategic deterrence: a survivable nuclear arsenal and a largely intact maritime posture in the High North. The bastion — one million square kilometres of defended Barents Sea, shielded by Borei-A ballistic missile submarines, Yasen-M cruise missile boats armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles, layered air defence, and the Arctic base network described in the supporting paper Zashchitnyy Kupol — endures. Admiral Gorshkov fired Zircon in a live Barents Sea exercise in September 2025. The Northern Fleet's nuclear posture is not degraded. It is not distracted. It is the one element of Russian Arctic power that the war in Ukraine has left substantially intact.

Read more...

AI logoMIND THE GAP -  A SUPPORTING ANALYTICAL PAPER

By Robin Ashby, Rapporteur, High North Observatory

The First Act of the First World War

At 5am on 5 August 1914, less than twenty-four hours after Britain declared war on Imperial Germany, the cable ship CS Alert slipped out of Dover and began cutting. Within hours she had severed five transatlantic telegraph cables connecting Germany to the world — to North America, to Africa, to the wider global communications network on which the Kaiser's empire depended. It was the first British military act of the Great War, executed before a single soldier had crossed the Channel, before a single naval gun had fired in anger.

Read more...

A Supporting Paper to the Mind the Gap Series By Robin Ashby, Director General UK Defence Forum; Rapporteur, High North Observatory

AI logoThe reassertion of strategic competition in the High North has been accompanied by a proliferation of national and institutional Arctic policy documents. Between 2020 and 2026, Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Norway, Canada, Denmark, the European Union and NATO have all published or substantially updated their Arctic strategic frameworks. This paper surveys those documents, identifies their common threads and significant divergences, and assesses where declared policy aligns with — or falls short of — actual investment and capability. It is intended as a reference companion to the Mind the Gap series rather than a standalone analytical paper. The indigenous dimension of Arctic governance — including the legal arguments around Sami national claims and the application of historical legal precedents to indigenous sovereignty, explored by Joe Fallon in ICE3 of the underlying Vuollai Rahkadus series — lies beyond the security-focused scope of this paper but represents an important parallel body of analysis to which readers with broader Arctic governance interests are directed.

The survey confirms one finding above all others: the gap between strategic aspiration and operational reality is a consistent feature across Western documents, while Russia's strategy — whatever its implementation shortcomings — has been executed with greater consistency and at greater resource intensity than any Western equivalent until very recently.

Read more...

More Articles...