 |
|
| Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders. |
|
Data from Hannah Kidd/ IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
A400M from Airbus Military
Range 6,400 Km with 20 tonne payload, 3,300 Km with max payload of 37 tonnes
Hold volume 340 M3
Length 17.72 M
Width 4.00 M
Height 3.85 M
Cost $146 m
KC-390 from Embraer (marketing agreement with Boeing)
Range 3,704 Km with 20 tonne payload. Max payload 23 tonne
Hold volume 169 M3
Length 18.54 M
Width 3.45 M
height 3.20 M
Cost $50 M
C-130J-30 (stretched Hercules) from Lockheed Martin
Range 2,222 Km with 20.4 tonne payload. Max payload 21.8 tonne
Hold volume 170.5 M3
Length 12.19 M
Width 3.12 M
Height 2.74 M
Cost $67.5 M
Latest from defenseindustrialbase.blogspot.com
- The aircraft carrier debate & Australia moving 500 miles Westwards: Plus-ca-change
- Editorial: Comment on the Guardian article, "Carriers without Harriers: budget cuts leave MoD with jump jet-shaped hole"
- Editorial: Commentary on the unveiling of SDSR Resource outcomes
- Editorial: Comment on Robert Preston blog 'What a Carrier-on!'
- Editorial: Termination of the UK Defence Training Review (DTR) - Justice belatedly served
Follow Us
Defence Blogs
Visitors
Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.
UKDF Defence Viewpoints is intended as a forum for political discussion and debate on security, defence, peace and strategic issues. The views of authors are theirs alone, and publication of them here should not be interpreted as an endorsement by the U K Defence Forum, which holds no views of its own, or any of its associates. We are grateful to thinktanks, academics and publications for permission to reproduce their material. Copyright remains with original authors even when anonymous.
Designed by:
