 |
|
| Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders. |
|
Ballistic missiles equipped with nuclear warheads and other mechanisms of mass destruction are the most potent weapons that America's defenders face. The number of ballistic missiles in global arsenals has declined considerably since the end of the Cold War, but the number of nations possessing such weapons has increased. At least nine countries today have both ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads, raising doubts about whether the traditional approach to deterrence can work over the long run.
Ballistic missile defense has the potential to strengthen deterrence by discouraging smaller nuclear nations from acquiring or launching weapons of mass destruction. While current U.S. defensive efforts pose little danger to the attack capabilities of Russia and China, they could completely defeat attacks by North Korea or Iran. That is especially true if enemy missiles can be intercepted in the earliest and most vulnerable stage of their trajectory, known as boost phase.
Interception of ballistic missiles in boost phase or the "ascent phase" that immediately follows rocket motor burnout enables defenders to destroy payloads before they separate into numerous, hard-to-track objects. This maximizes the effectiveness of any defensive system, thinning out or eliminating the threat faced by subsequent layers of defense.
The U.S. Missile Defense Agency currently is funding several boost-phase interception programs. The Kinetic Energy Interceptor is a mobile, fast-reacting missile that can be quickly deployed worldwide for early interception of ballistic missiles. The Airborne Laser is an aircraft-mounted beam weapon that can hit lofting missiles at the speed of light and will be demonstrated against a live target in 2009.
The Network Centric Airborne Defense Element and Air Launched Hit-to-Kill programs are less costly adaptations of existing weapons to the boost-phase interception mission.
Copyright 2009 The Heritage Foundation. www.heritage.org Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved.
Follow Us
Defence Blogs
Visitors
Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.
UKDF Defence Viewpoints is intended as a forum for political discussion and debate on security, defence, peace and strategic issues. The views of authors are theirs alone, and publication of them here should not be interpreted as an endorsement by the U K Defence Forum, which holds no views of its own, or any of its associates. We are grateful to thinktanks, academics and publications for permission to reproduce their material. Copyright remains with original authors even when anonymous.
Designed by:
