 |
|
| Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders. |
|
Round-up of his views expressed Friday, May 14, 2010
Compiled by Defence Management Journal
The former head of the British army has said that troop numbers need not be cut in the strategic defence and security review (SDSR) if the government looks for savings in the Ministry of Defence equipment programme.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, General Sir Richard Dannatt said: "I think by anyone's recognition we've got too many tanks, too much heavy artillery, too many fast jets.
"The navy needs to look very closely at what it needs to be. And I think, particularly as far as fast jets are concerned, a number of contracts need to be looked at. One of which is the air-to-air refuelling contract, which was a shameful one, very, very expensive two years ago.
"A new government has got a chance to look a number of contractors in the face and say 'hang on, things have changed. We're going to do it differently'. We can make a lot of savings on the equipment programme and still do what we need to do.
General Dannatt described speculation that the armed forces could do without the Royal Air Force as 'facile'. "We need three separate armed forces that work superbly together on joint operations," he said.
In a separate article in the Daily Telegraph, General Dannatt praised the coalition government's decision to convene a meeting of the new national security council on its first day was a "great step forward", and an improvement on the previous government's "hotchpotch of subcommittees".
"It recognises that the defence of the realm, the safety of its citizens and the wellbeing of its Armed Forces should be at the heart of policy-making," General Dannatt said of the council.
Welcoming the appointment of Sir Peter Ricketts as National Security Advisor, General Dannatt wrote: "With his experience at the Foreign Office, NATO and as chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, he has the knowledge and gravitas for this new and important role.
"By showing the clear importance he attaches to issues of defence and security, David Cameron has made the best possible start.
Follow Us
Defence Blogs
Visitors
Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.
UKDF Defence Viewpoints is intended as a forum for political discussion and debate on security, defence, peace and strategic issues. The views of authors are theirs alone, and publication of them here should not be interpreted as an endorsement by the U K Defence Forum, which holds no views of its own, or any of its associates. We are grateful to thinktanks, academics and publications for permission to reproduce their material. Copyright remains with original authors even when anonymous.
Designed by:
