Articles and analysis

Earlier this week, the Labour Party released its guide to fringe events at its conference. One particular event caught our eye, a meeting entitled "Britain's defence capability: challenges of the 21st century", tucked away at 8am on the Monday morning.

Who exactly do they expect to attract to this meeting, then? More importantly, who exactly are they trying avoid? Could it be that the Party wants to steer clear of the anti-arms lobby? Are they hoping that the expected throng of arms protestors from the loony fringe will (like this correspondent, and no doubt a fair proportion of the rest of Britain) still be fresh out of bed, bleary-eyed, searching for coffee and toast, and not remotely ready to jump around in Manchester on an autumnal Monday morning with placards in hand?

Even more tellingly, whilst the five packed days of fringe events cover almost every topic under the sun from every conceivable angle, why is this meeting the only one which looks set to cover defence procurement issues?

Answers on a postcard please......

Were recent events in Georgia a one-off or the start of something more permanent in Russia's "near abroad"? We hear distant echoes of Herr Hitler, his quest for Lebensraum and a Greater Germany, using allegations about the treatment of ethnic Germans in neighbouring states as a pretext for action for their "protection" followed by rapid annexation. And history buffs will recall the troubles caused to the British Empire in that part of the world by a rampant Russia.

Read more...

Viewpoints wonders if the MoD and Baroness Taylor, Minster for defence procurement, have their priorities right in planning to meet with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) to discuss 'alternatives' to the hats worn by guards at Buckingham Palace.
Err....yes, you read that right. The hats of Buck House's famous guardsmen have been causing quite uproar amongst animal lovers it seems.

Previously, the animal rights group has suggested that fake fur to be used rather than the traditional bearskin but these proposals were dismissed by the MoD as unworkable. The material used for fake fur has been deemed to be neither durable nor weatherproof enough for practical wear.

PETA have also approached Vivienne Westwood, Stella McCartney and Marc Bouwer with a view to designing a new hat. Robbie LeBlanc, Peta's director for Europe, stated that although the group was proposing a new shape it did not mean that this could not become 'iconic.'

'Iconic' in what way we ask? Just because they're good enough for the catwalks of Milan doesn't mean they're good enough for British troops. From looking at the offerings of Vivienne Westwood we'll stick to our bearskins. Iconic yes; suitable for Palace guards no!

Peta's campaign against the hats had included a naked protest outside Buckingham Palace continuing its reputation for over the top protests and claims.

"Most people think its fake fur and when they find out its real and it takes one bear to make a hat, they are appalled," he said. He also added that the MoD have spent over £320,000 on the hats in the past five years.

A spokeswoman for the MoD said: "The MoD is not opposed to the use of synthetic materials as an alternative to bearskins, provided such materials meet the requirement for a high quality product that performs adequately in all weather conditions. Regrettably, a suitable alternative continues to prove elusive."

Oh what a shame(!) Well, until then we'll let Peta and Stella McCartney et al get on with coming up with such an alternative. It's their time. We hope the meeting tomorrow is short as possible (about 2 minutes should do it) and Baroness Taylor can get on with more sobering, pressing concerns such as the equipment troops are supplied with on the front line.

More Articles...