 |
|
| Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders. |
|
£1330m BVT Surface Fleet (Glasgow & Portsmouth). Manufacture of lower stern and lower forward sections
£ 675m Babcock Marine (Rosyth). Bows; upper hull sections; final assembly
£ 425m Thales UK. Design and engineering services
£ 300m BAE Systems Submarine Solutions (Barrow). Amidships hull blocks
£ 275m BAE Systems Insyte. Design and supply mission systems
£ 800m To be competed. Upper hull sections; islands
According to a recent Parliamentary Answer, 60% of sub-contracts will be competed.
Of course, the elephant on the flight deck is the aircraft: pick a number in the vicinity of £10 billion, convert into dollars and send west!
(Data source: BVT Surface Fleet talking to Jane's Defence Weekly)
Latest from defenseindustrialbase.blogspot.com
- The aircraft carrier debate & Australia moving 500 miles Westwards: Plus-ca-change
- Editorial: Comment on the Guardian article, "Carriers without Harriers: budget cuts leave MoD with jump jet-shaped hole"
- Editorial: Commentary on the unveiling of SDSR Resource outcomes
- Editorial: Comment on Robert Preston blog 'What a Carrier-on!'
- Editorial: Termination of the UK Defence Training Review (DTR) - Justice belatedly served
Follow Us
Defence Blogs
Visitors
Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.
UKDF Defence Viewpoints is intended as a forum for political discussion and debate on security, defence, peace and strategic issues. The views of authors are theirs alone, and publication of them here should not be interpreted as an endorsement by the U K Defence Forum, which holds no views of its own, or any of its associates. We are grateful to thinktanks, academics and publications for permission to reproduce their material. Copyright remains with original authors even when anonymous.
Designed by:
